This is either me doing something wrong, or a rather serious bug.
To make backup exports I have been using a rather simple script. But recently I found that this script is maybe not returning all entries, making the backups incomplete.
I have a Collection called laadpalen
and a basic index called all_laadpalen
with default settings (serialized, not unique and giving back refs).
client.query(
q.Map(
q.Paginate(
q.Match(q.Index('all_laadpalen'), { size: 100000 }
),
q.Lambda("X", q.Get(q.Var("X")))
)
).then(response => response.data)
This query gives back 39205 results.
In my application I used more specific indexes, one of which (laadpalen_by_code
) is based on a code
term. Each entry in laadpalen
has a code
value. Otherwise it’s the same: serialized, not unique and giving back refs.
What I recently found was that the all_laadpalen
index gave back 192 entries with the code 0828, while the laadpalen_by_code
index gave back 296 entries.
Setting up a new query to gather all entries with the laadpalen_by_code
index using Union (code below) gave 39638, a difference of 436 entries.
My question: how can this be? Did I do something wrong? Or is the all_laadpalen
index broken?
client.query(
q.Map(
q.Paginate(
q.Union(
q.Match(q.Index('laadpalen_by_code'), '0828'),
q.Match(q.Index('laadpalen_by_code'), '0753'),
[...]
),
{ size: 100000 }
),
q.Lambda("X", q.Get(q.Var("X")))
)
).then(response => response.data)